Claude Opus 4.7vsGemini 3.5 Pro
Anthropic vs Google Deep Mind
Overview
Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 and Google DeepMind's Gemini 3.5 Pro represent two different design philosophies. Claude Opus 4.7 prioritizes coding performance (SWE-bench Pro 64.3) and safety, while Gemini 3.5 Pro leverages multimodal processing and a 1M-token context window.
Specs & Pricing
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Google Deep Mind |
| Type | foundation | foundation |
| Parameters | 非公開 | 非公開 |
| Context Window | — | — |
| Open Source | — | — |
| Input Price (/1M tokens) | $2.5 | — |
| Output Price (/1M tokens) | — | — |
Recommendations by Use Case
Which model fits your task best
Claude Opus 4.7's SWE-bench Pro 64.3 demonstrates clear superiority in practical software engineering tasks.
Gemini 3.5 Pro's 1M-token context window is unmatched for processing massive documents and video content.
Claude Opus 4.7 is renowned for natural, human-like writing — ideal for business documents and creative writing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.7 leads with SWE-bench Pro 64.3. Recommended for practical software development.
Which handles long documents better?
Gemini 3.5 Pro's 1M-token context is unmatched — it can process book-length documents or multi-hour video transcripts in one go.