이 모델의 강점은 무엇인가요?

방대한 2840B 파라미터 1M 토큰의 긴 컨텍스트 이해 MIT 라이선스를 통한 높은 자유도

이 모델의 약점은 무엇인가요?

추론 시 높은 계산 부담 대형 모델 사이즈로 인한 운영 비용 증가 운영 시 높은 메모리 소비

어떤 용도에 가장 적합한가요?

대규모 문서의 고급 분석 복잡한 논리적 추론이 필요한 작업 긴 컨텍스트 기능을 활용한 개발

모델 목록으로

DeepSeek오픈소스

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Name: DeepSeek V4 Flash
Price: 0.14 USD
Author: DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash는 DeepSeek-AI가 개발한 추론 모델입니다. 약 2840B에 달하는 방대한 파라미터와 1M 토큰의 긴 컨텍스트 윈도우를 가지고 있습니다.

파라미터

2840.0B

컨텍스트

라이선스

MIT

출시일

2026-04-24

API 가격

입력 가격 (1M 토큰당)

$0.14

출력 가격 (1M 토큰당)

$0.28

과금 모드: standard

강점

・방대한 2840B 파라미터
・1M 토큰의 긴 컨텍스트 이해
・MIT 라이선스를 통한 높은 자유도

약점

・추론 시 높은 계산 부담
・대형 모델 사이즈로 인한 운영 비용 증가
・운영 시 높은 메모리 소비

활용 사례

・대규모 문서의 고급 분석
・복잡한 논리적 추론이 필요한 작업
・긴 컨텍스트 기능을 활용한 개발

심층 분석

Total Parameters

284B

13B activated per token

Context Window

1M tokens

8x increase from V3.2's 128K

Input Price (cache miss)

$0.14/1M tokens

Cache hit: $0.028/1M

Output Price

$0.28/1M tokens

SWE-Bench Verified

79%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: 80.6%

GPQA Diamond

88.1%

From official evaluations

강점

・Extremely cost-effective with strong coding/agentic performance relative to price
・1M-token context window with efficient hybrid attention architecture (CSA + HCA)
・Open-weight under MIT license with multiple inference providers available

약점

・Weaker on complex agentic tasks and factual knowledge compared to DeepSeek V4 Pro
・High hallucination rate (96%) when uncertain, as reported by Artificial Analysis
・Preview model: behavior and pricing may change before final release

경쟁사 비교

Model	Arena	SWE	GPQA	Price
DeepSeek V4 Pro	1460	80.6%	90.1%	$0.435/$0.87 (input/output per 1M tokens)
Kimi K2.6	1454	80.2%	90.5%	Not publicly listed
Claude Sonnet 4.6	1459	79.6%	89.9%	Not publicly listed

개요

DeepSeek V4 Flash represents a major leap in cost-efficient, long-context AI models. Released as part of the V4 preview on April 24, 2026, it is a 284B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with only 13B parameters activated per token, achieving a 1M-token context window through innovative hybrid attention mechanisms (Compressed Sparse Attention and Heavily Compressed Attention). This architecture enables dramatically reduced compute requirements—only 10% of the FLOPs and 7% of the KV cache compared to DeepSeek V3.2 at 1M context—making million-token inference practical. Positioned as the efficiency-focused sibling to the larger DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T parameters), Flash is designed for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications like coding agents, long-document analysis, and tool-calling pipelines. While it trails Pro on complex reasoning and factual knowledge tasks, it delivers remarkably strong performance on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench: 79%, LiveCodeBench: 91.6%) and multi-turn agentic workflows at a fraction of the cost. The model is available under an MIT license via multiple providers (Novita, Fireworks AI, DeepInfra, Featherless AI) with API pricing starting at $0.14/1M input tokens and $0.28/1M output tokens. This makes it one of the most affordable frontier-tier models available, particularly attractive for teams looking to scale AI workloads without incurring the costs associated with premium models from OpenAI or Anthropic.

벤치마크 및 성능

DeepSeek V4 Flash delivers competitive performance across key benchmarks, particularly in coding and reasoning tasks, while maintaining significant cost advantages. Below is a detailed comparison with the Pro version and frontier models: | Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) | Kimi K2.6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Notes | |-----------|-------------------------|------------------------|-----------|-------------------|-------| | **GPQA Diamond** | 88.1% | 90.1% | 90.5% | 89.9% | Flash trails by 2-2.4% | | **SWE-Bench Verified** | 79.0% | 80.6% | 80.2% | 79.6% | Within noise of Claude/Kimi | | **LiveCodeBench** | 91.6% | 93.5% | 89.6% | - | Strong coding performance | | **MMLU-Pro** | 86.2% | 87.5% | - | - | Competitive knowledge | | **Terminal-Bench 2.0** | 56.9% | 67.9% | - | - | Significant gap vs Pro | | **Chatbot Arena Elo** | 1433 | 1460 | 1454 | 1459 | Slightly below frontier | | **Humanity's Last Exam** | 34.8% | 37.7% | - | - | Knowledge gap vs frontier | | **MRCR 1M (MMR)** | 78.7% | 83.5% | - | - | Strong long-context retrieval | *Note: All scores from official DeepSeek evaluations or leaderboards (BenchLM.ai, Artificial Analysis). Flash's performance relative to Pro is most notable on coding tasks (within 1-2 points) and weaker on complex agentic workloads (11-point gap on Terminal-Bench).*

상세 비교

**DeepSeek V4 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro** - **Pricing**: Flash is ~12x cheaper on output ($0.28 vs $3.48 per 1M tokens) - **Performance**: Pro leads by 1-2% on coding benchmarks, 11% on Terminal-Bench, and 23.8% on SimpleQA factual recall - **Use case**: Flash for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks; Pro for maximum reasoning and agentic workloads **DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.6** - **Context window**: Flash offers 1M vs Kimi's 262K - **Performance**: Kimi edges ahead on GPQA (90.5% vs 88.1%) and SWE-Bench (80.2% vs 79.0%) - **Pricing**: Flash is explicitly priced; Kimi's pricing not publicly listed **DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6** - **Context window**: Both 1M tokens - **Performance**: Nearly identical on SWE-Bench (79.0% vs 79.6%), Flash better on GPQA (88.1% vs 89.9%) - **Pricing**: Flash at $0.14/$0.28 vs Claude's estimated $0.50/$1.50 (based on Opus pricing patterns) - **Openness**: Flash is open-weight (MIT); Claude is closed-source *Key insight: Flash competes directly with mid-tier models from competitors while offering significantly better pricing and comparable or superior performance on coding tasks.*

커뮤니티 평가

Developer and researcher reactions to DeepSeek V4 Flash have been overwhelmingly positive, particularly regarding its price-performance ratio: - **Coding agents**: Multiple r/LocalLLaMA users report Flash is fast and cheap enough to replace Claude Haiku or Gemma 4 in tool-calling pipelines, with tool-call schema designed to maintain interleaved thinking across tool boundaries - **Cost excitement**: The $0.14/$0.28 pricing is described as "Haiku-tier" with one commenter noting: "If you're running agentic workloads on Claude or GPT today, test Flash this week. The pricing alone justifies a half-day of effort." - **Adoption patterns**: Over 2.7 million downloads on HuggingFace within weeks of release, with integration across 40+ Spaces and multiple inference providers (Novita, Fireworks AI, etc.) - **Stability concerns**: Some early reports of intermittent timeouts on very long requests via Ollama cloud, likely due to release-day load spikes - **Benchmark validation**: Vals AI reported Flash "overwhelmingly topped" open-source models on their Vibe Code Benchmark with roughly a 10x jump from V3.2, though independent verification is ongoing - **Architecture praise**: Technical communities highlight the hybrid attention (CSA+HCA) and FP4/FP8 precision as enabling practical million-token inference, with one engineer noting: "That 27% of single-token FLOPs number is doing real work behind the pricing tier." *Overall sentiment: Flash is seen as a game-changer for cost-sensitive production workloads, though the preview status means teams are proceeding with staged rollouts rather than immediate full migration.*

활용 사례

**1. High-Volume Coding Agents & Code Generation** - Use case: GitHub Copilot-style code completion, repository analysis, multi-file refactoring - Example: An AI coding assistant processing 1,000 daily code review requests with 250K input/20K output tokens each - Why Flash: At $117.60/month for the above workload, it's 8-10x cheaper than Claude/GPT alternatives while matching performance on SWE-Bench Verified - When to choose: Default route for most coding tasks; escalate to Pro only for the most complex multi-step agent loops **2. Long-Document Analysis & Summarization** - Use case: Legal contract review, technical documentation summarization, research paper analysis - Example: Processing 500-page legal documents (400K tokens) with targeted extraction queries - Why Flash: 1M context eliminates chunking needs; hybrid attention maintains efficiency even at maximum context - When to choose: All single-pass document tasks; Pro only when factual recall accuracy is critical (SimpleQA gap matters) **3. High-Throughput Multi-Model Routing** - Use case: AI platform serving diverse user requests with cost-performance optimization - Example: API gateway routing 70% of requests to Flash (simple queries), 20% to Pro (complex reasoning), 10% to GPT-5.4/Claude (highest-stakes tasks) - Why Flash: $0.28/1M output tokens makes it viable as the default route without breaking budgets - When to choose: Default for all non-premium workloads; Pro for escalation when Flash confidence thresholds are missed **4. Cost-Sensitive Research & Experimentation** - Use case: Academic research, startup prototyping, hackathon projects - Example: Researchers running thousands of experimental prompts across different reasoning modes (Non-think, Think High, Think Max) - Why Flash: MIT license allows modification; pricing enables large-scale experimentation at <10% of closed-model costs - When to choose: All research contexts where model weights access and cost matter; Pro only for final benchmarking or production deployment

최신 뉴스

**April 24, 2026: DeepSeek V4 Preview Launch** - Flash and Pro models released as preview versions on HuggingFace with MIT license - Official API endpoints (`deepseek-v4-flash`, `deepseek-v4-pro`) now live - Pricing: Flash $0.14/$0.28, Pro $1.74/$3.48 (75% promo through May 31, 2026 for Pro) - Deprecation notice: `deepseek-chat` and `deepseek-reasoner` model IDs to be retired July 24, 2026 **Key Technical Innovations** - Hybrid attention architecture (Compressed Sparse Attention + Heavily Compressed Attention) enabling 1M-token context at 10% FLOPs vs V3.2 - FP4/FP8 mixed precision: MoE experts in FP4, other parameters in FP8 - Three reasoning modes: Non-think (fast), Think High (balanced), Think Max (maximum reasoning, 384K+ context recommended) **Provider Availability** - Launch partners: Novita (cheapest/fastest), Fireworks AI, DeepInfra, Featherless AI - All providers support tool calling; DeepInfra also supports structured outputs - Ollama cloud integration announced (via `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud` tag) **Benchmark Highlights** - Coding: 79% SWE-Bench Verified, 91.6% LiveCodeBench - Long-context: 78.7% MRCR 1M retrieval, 60.5% CorpusQA 1M - Reasoning: 88.1% GPQA Diamond (Think Max mode) **Industry Reaction** - Artificial Analysis: Flash scores 47 on Intelligence Index (comparable to Claude Sonnet 4.6) - BenchLM.ai: Ranks #50 overall, #41 in coding category - Simon Willison: Notes Flash draws better pelicans than Pro in creative tests **Pricing Comparison** - Flash output pricing ($0.28/1M) is 1/86th of Claude Opus 4.6's $25/1M for comparable coding performance - Pro promotional pricing ($0.87/1M output) makes it ~1/29th of Claude Opus costs

Positioned as the efficiency-focused sibling to the larger DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T parameters), Flash is designed for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications like coding agents, long-document analysis, and tool-calling pipelines. While it trails Pro on complex reasoning and factual knowledge tasks, it delivers remarkably strong performance on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench: 79%, LiveCodeBench: 91.6%) and multi-turn agentic workflows at a fraction of the cost.

The model is available under an MIT license via multiple providers (Novita, Fireworks AI, DeepInfra, Featherless AI) with API pricing starting at $0.14/1M input tokens and $0.28/1M output tokens. This makes it one of the most affordable frontier-tier models available, particularly attractive for teams looking to scale AI workloads without incurring the costs associated with premium models from OpenAI or Anthropic.

출처

분석 생성일: 2026-05-23